Herbivore-induced species replacement in grasslands: Is it driven by herbivory tolerance or avoidance?
-
-
Authors: V. J. Anderson, and D. D. Briske
Date: 1995
Journal: Ecological Applications
Volume: 5
Number: 4
Pages: 1014-1024
Summary of Methods: Schizachyrium scoparium is a dominant late-seral perennial grass that was grown in competition with another S. scoparium, with Bothriochloa saccharoides, or with Stipa leucotrichaor (two other mid-seral perennials), and clipped four times a year to simulate uniform or selective grazing (towards S. scoparium). Selective defoliation did not significantly (a = 0.1) reduce basal area of S. scoparium, that was 175% greater when grown with the other species and subject to uniform defoliation. Other measures of productivity (tiller mass, number of leaves, xylem pressure potential, etc.) were influenced by species selective interactions. Selectively grazing hurt plants to a degree, depending on competition, for example S. scoparium is as grazing tolerant as the other two species, and selective grazing drives species replacement, not tolerance of mid-seral species relative to late-seral species. The greater competitive ability of S. scoparium that was amplified in uniform grazing situations implies that some types of grazing may inhibit species replacement, rather then inducing it. However, heavy selective grazing may result in a shift in species composition.
Article Summary / Main Points: None
Vegetation Types:
MLRA Ecoregions:
Agrovoc Control Words: Riparian zones Rangelands Wildlife
Article Review Type: Refereed
Article Type: Experimental Research
Keywords: competition, grass-grazer interactions, resistance, tolerance, avoidance, selective herbivory, seral-stage, schizachyrium scoparium
Annotation: Plants were clipped to heights of 15 and 25 cm for vegetative and reproductive respectively. Authors refer to removal of approximately 70% aboveground biomass as "moderate" grazing. This summary lists the authors' stated grazing intensity (moderate), as well as the grazing intensity as determined by the project guidelines (vegetation removal between 60-80% of current year growth = heavy grazing intensity). Regional drought in the second year may have affected competitiveness. Some responses may reflect drought tolerance, not grazing tolerance.
-
Get article
Cite article with DOI
-